I have done 2 rent-to-owns (as landlord) and both times I negotiated a certain % increase in the value of the house per year. I tried to base it on 50% of the projected increase over the term of the RTO. For example, if a house is worth $400,000 today, and is projected to increase annually by 8% per year, then I charge 4% per year. on a 2 year term, the renter has the option to buy the house for $432,000.
There are a number of reasons why investors would do this, contrary to the article’s comments. For example, you pretty much have a guaranteed buyer for a property in 2-3 years, thereby eliminating much of the closing costs (i.e. realtor fees being the largest). Plus, it allows me to invest in real estate with only 20% down, so i can do a few RTO’s at a time. With the non-refundable down payment from the renter, it is a major incentive for the renter to actually follow through and exercise the option to buy, as well as the renter taking good care of the property (it is gonna be theirs after all). These are just a few examples, and all terms are negotiable.
This program is really only for people with bad credit and who make decent money and really want to get into the housing market. If you had good credit, there’d be no point in renting to own, just go to a bank, you’d be way better off.
]]>Anyone considering a rent-to-own scheme should seek legal advice as to the procedures, rights and obligations, and consequences of entering into such an agreement. I am not a lawyer, so I can’t give legal advice.
]]>